RAID 50 with 14 disks — 12 usable
14 disks in RAID 50 give you 12 disks’ worth, with 2 spent on parity or mirroring. That is 85.7% efficiency, and it always survives 1 failure.
- Disks
- 14
- Usable disks
- 12
- Spent on parity or mirror
- 2
- Capacity efficiency
- 85.7%
- Failures always survived
- 1
- Best case
- 2
- Groups
- 2
- Disks per group
- 7
RAID 50
Several RAID 5 groups striped together. Each group spends one disk on parity, so more groups means less capacity and more failures survived.
TB on the label, TiB on the screen
- 1 TB × 1412 TB · 10.91 TiB
- 2 TB × 1424 TB · 21.83 TiB
- 4 TB × 1448 TB · 43.66 TiB
- 6 TB × 1472 TB · 65.48 TiB
- 8 TB × 1496 TB · 87.31 TiB
- 10 TB × 14120 TB · 109.14 TiB
- 12 TB × 14144 TB · 130.97 TiB
- 14 TB × 14168 TB · 152.8 TiB
- 16 TB × 14192 TB · 174.62 TiB
- 18 TB × 14216 TB · 196.45 TiB
- 20 TB × 14240 TB · 218.28 TiB
- 22 TB × 14264 TB · 240.11 TiB
- 24 TB × 14288 TB · 261.93 TiB
One TB on the box is 10¹² bytes, while the operating system counts in units of 2⁴⁰ bytes. The names look alike but the units differ, so the same disk reads about 9% smaller. Nothing went missing — the ruler changed.
Same disk count, other levels
Same level, other disk counts
The rebuild is the dangerous part
When a single-parity array loses a disk, you put a new one in and every remaining disk is read end to end to rebuild it. That is precisely when the survivors work hardest and longest. The bigger and more numerous the disks, the longer the rebuild — days, sometimes — and a second failure during it ends the array. This is why RAID 6 or 10 is preferred over RAID 5 on large arrays.
How to read it
- Usable = total − parity × groups. Every level is that one line.
- RAID 5 spends one parity disk in a single group, so n−1; RAID 6 spends two, so n−2.
- RAID 50 and 60 run several such groups striped together, so the parity is multiplied by the group count.
- RAID 1 holds one copy on every disk, so one disk’s worth; RAID 10 mirrors in pairs, so half.
- Groups must be equal in size, so the group count can only be a divisor of the disk count.
- TB on the box and TiB on the screen are different units — about 9% apart.
RAID is not a backup
RAID protects against exactly one thing: a disk dying. A file deleted by mistake, a file overwritten, ransomware, a failed controller, fire or theft all propagate to every disk at once — a mirror deletes just as faithfully as it writes. A backup is a separate copy on separate hardware, and RAID is not doing that job.
Common questions
Q. How much do 14 disks give in RAID 50?
12 disks’ worth. 2 go to parity or mirroring, for 85.7% efficiency.
Q. How many failures does it survive?
1 always, and up to 2 if they land in the right places.
Q. How many TB with 4 TB disks?
48 TB, which the operating system shows as 43.66 TiB — different units, same bytes.
Q. What is this level?
Several RAID 5 groups striped together. Each group spends one disk on parity, so more groups means less capacity and more failures survived.